Post by joacen on Aug 2, 2011 9:31:20 GMT -5
I've been reading quite a few comments particularly on YouTube criticizing Harry Friedman for the changes he has brought to Wheel over the years. One comment reads:
"their big mistake was Harry Friedman, in my opinion. He attempted to make the show more... hip and with it, with all of the overly-flashy, hi-tech graphics, set changes, and unneeded theme weeks... Now, it's barely watchable. If it's not broken, there's no need to fix it..."
I personally don't think that Harry has done a bad job with the show, but then again, my opinion may be biased since I'm only 15 years old, and Harry has been a producer ever since I began watching.
Despite that, Wheel of Fortune is still the same game that viewers have come to know and love over the past 29 years. Harry has managed to make changes to the show without changing the core gameplay. Plus, I think he's doing a much better job handling this show than a certain executive producer on TPIR......
What are your opinions on Harry Friedman? Do you think he's done a good job handling the show?
"their big mistake was Harry Friedman, in my opinion. He attempted to make the show more... hip and with it, with all of the overly-flashy, hi-tech graphics, set changes, and unneeded theme weeks... Now, it's barely watchable. If it's not broken, there's no need to fix it..."
I personally don't think that Harry has done a bad job with the show, but then again, my opinion may be biased since I'm only 15 years old, and Harry has been a producer ever since I began watching.
Despite that, Wheel of Fortune is still the same game that viewers have come to know and love over the past 29 years. Harry has managed to make changes to the show without changing the core gameplay. Plus, I think he's doing a much better job handling this show than a certain executive producer on TPIR......
What are your opinions on Harry Friedman? Do you think he's done a good job handling the show?
